2012 Series 006 – Communication

The Power of Shutting Up

I once attended a business dinner where one of the participants is an expert in a particular type of business, whom I was looking forward to learn from. To my horror, another participant sitting close to us has the uncanny ability to answer questions not directed at him. This participant did not have work experience on the business (I asked) yet he continued to answers questions about the business, and when the expert finally had the chance to talk, this other participant doesn’t seem particularly interested. What could have been a chance to learn something, was wasted.

My chance was wasted because this other participant didn’t want to shut up.

But this other’s participant’s chance is even more wasted because he is carrying that inability to shut up wherever he goes.

But I too find myself guilty of the same inability to shut up. Continue reading


2012 Series 005 – Integrity

Moments of Truth

Integrity is the ability to face personally compromising situations with courage, and consciously choose truth as a response even at risk of loss.

Integrity is proven at moments of truth.

Person of integrity recognizes moments of truth, faced the fear of risk and loss that characterizes such moments, and choose to speak truth.

Person of integrity does not allow lapses in integrity to continue.

When he fails to act or speak with integrity, he/she is willing to admit such failures, even at risk of losing face.

He/she choose to not define himself, or his future actions by what he had failed to do and decide he can do something different, the right thing, when the next moment of truth comes up.

  1. Recognize moments of truth

Continue reading

2012 Series 004 – Respect

Respect here means respect for human and the human nature, which are:

  • Man will always seek value
  • The definition of value is different for each man

And that respect is important because the person, company, or organization that respects the human nature will be successful.

Continue reading

The difference between life and non-life


I read an article on SciAm on how life is actually non-sense, that the reason people struggle to find a consistent reliable definition of life is because life doesn’t exist. The article is here: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/brainwaves/2013/12/02/why-life-does-not-really-exist/

A quote from the article: “There is no threshold at which a collection of atoms suddenly becomes alive, no categorical distinction between the living and inanimate, no Frankensteinian spark. We have failed to define life because there was never anything to define in the first place.”

I find the above conclusion somewhat fraught. It looks at 2 phenomenon: life & the fact that life and non-life items share the same base components, and make a conclusion based on 1 direction of correlation; which is: since atoms makes life and non-life, then there’s no difference between life & non-life, thus such distinction is fictional.

Yet it could have easily see the 2 phenomenon, and instead conclude this: since life exist, and yet the same atoms make life and non-life, then there’s a factor that differentiates life and non-life.

Here’s my take on the definition on life and non-life

I posit that there’s a factor that differentiates life and non-life.

Life cares about its continued existence, through homeostasis, reproduction, and evolution.

One question about evolution that’s rarely asked is: why should genes care? Why should gene care whether they exist or not? Why should genes care enough to evolve?

Everything in universe, if left as it is, has a tendency towards degradation, the slow decline to continually lower energy states. The existence of matter and concentration of energy itself shows the existence of vacuum. Vacuum demanding equilibrium, achieve through decline of the non-vacuum.

Why should life be different? Why should genes, be any different? Why should genes has motive when everything else in universe, except vacuum, has no motive?

Rock has no motive. It doesn’t try to achieve homeostasis, or to reproduce, or to evolve. Rocks formed, then energy exerts its forces to rock through lava eruption, tectonic movements, erosion, meteoric impact, etc.

Water has no motive, hydrogen has no motive, oxygen has no motive, stars has no motive, matter has no motive, energy has no motive. Everything in universe has no motive. Vacuum has motive. Motive to degrade concentration of matter & energy, degrade non-vacuum.

And life, life has motive.

Whatever shape of life. They all have motive.

So i think, the distinction between life and non-life is the existence of motive, the motive to exist. Continue reading

Startup CEO Role

A. Defining the business model & operational model

B. Defining the activities and how it’s going to be distributed

C. Defining the battle commander and the quarter master

D. Creating intense excellence and spreading it around

Continue reading

Economic value and world total wealth

All economic value is distributed among receiver of taxes, profits, and wages. From man, by man, for man. Nature extracted.

Think about any industry and you will find that all that revenue will finally goes to government, capital owner, and labor. Either directly to the company or through it’s supplier.

But how about cost of goods sold and depreciation? Well, those cost are becomes revenue for the supplier, who in turn pays the government, their labor, their capital owner, and their own set of supplier.

Then how about producer of base metals? Well, their revenue is distributed among government, labor, capital owner, machinery and equipment (which is a set of supplier), and fuel.

Then how about the producer of fuel? Now, this is where the first statement becomes very apparent. The revenue that oil company makes is distributed to government, labor, capital owner, machinery and equipment and service supplier.

The ground, nature, out of which oil is extracted, ask and receives no money.

But how about rehabilitation attempts? True, reclamation returns nature to its “previous” state. But all the money spend on rehabilitating nature is distributed to government, labor, and capital owner.

Continue reading

You Never Actually Own Your I-Tunes Content, You Just Don’t

I use Iphone & Ipad, and I was happy with how my Itunes work.

Then one day I heard about the new GoogleMap App for Apple, & I also like to download the Rotten Tomatoes App. But I found that these 2 app are not available in the Itunes Indonesian store but is available on the US Itunes Store.

My first though is, “what? I thought the point of online store for digital content is you can access content from countries you could not normally get if you relied on physical distribution channel (e.g. of reason: insufficient interest to motivate a retailer to stock content)” Continue reading